robotbisexual:

autismserenity:

yourlocalangryqueer:

nb-ace-alliance:

cistrendered:

back in 2012-ish, at the peak of truscum discourse, they literally used mogai, tucute and transtrender synonymously to mock people, and it was always about having too many labels, or thinking it’s some fun club to be trans.. so, just reflect on what kind of thinking you’re promoting when you’re saying “mogais are just straights that wanna be special by having lots of labels for their orientation”..

Honestly, I see tons of very justified commentary about how closely ace discourse resembles “bihet” rhetoric, and I think that its eerie similarity to truscum rhetoric is also deserving of more exposure.

Truscum were anti-nonbinary because they believed:
– we were really just cis peope infiltrating the community by claiming to be trans
– we would steal resources
– our words were made up
– we had too many of them
– they were overly specific
– we were diluting the meaning of transness
– we weren’t really oppressed

This is why I get pissed as shit when people mock “MOGAI Tumblr”

Don’t forget “they’ll make young gay people unnecessarily question their identities because of internalized homophobia!”

I’m gonna say it real straight and clear: anti mogai sentiment and rhetoric is literally left over anti nonbinary sentiment and rhetoric.

You jumped on the “mogai was a mistake/is embarrassing” or “fucking mogai identities!” bandwagon? Great! You just repeated anti nonbinary bullshit started by truscum to undermine a community that was created most primarily bc NB PEOPLE WERE CHASED FROM THE LGBT AND NEEDED AN ALTERNATIVE.

Every single one of your Edgy™ mogai mockeries that you picked up from one of the other discoursers you follow was created originally by a truscum to hurt nonbinary people.

I’ve even seen the “mogai hair” and “looks/sounds like a mogai” used to try to mean aces, completely ignorant of the fact that those phrases literally mean “nonbinary people.”