trans-cishet:

trans-cishet:

hate2breakittoya:

bipeoplearentyourpawns:

trans-cishet:

@hate2breakittoya (tumblr wont let me @ her) has a tag called “mogai hell denial” where anons tell her their stories with identities and blame it on “mogai hell”

this is shit in itself but they include fucking trans identities in there as if they were somehow tricked into identifying as trans and that’s fault of mogai 

this is fucking twerf and truscum rethoric and the worst part of it is that she doesnt even call it out lmao

@hate2breakittoya what a reach lmao

im laughin so hard holy shit

me

yall wont believe what happens next!!

the-unapologetic-ace:

I would like to remind everyone that as this discourse seems to be subtly shifting to pan and nb identities, please support pan and nb people. First it was bi discourse, then ace/aro, and now exclusionists are moving further down the line. 

Stick up for people. We really need to continue shutting this trend down because excluding identities outside L and G is completely unacceptable. 

iron-sunrise:

fumbledeegrumble:

twink-privilege:

bluedaggers:

socialjusticeichigo:

selectivelyserious:

urstraight:

for those who keep saying that aspec isn’t for autistic people

reblogging for reference

This is so disingenuous? I tried repeating the search because I was curious.

It’s coming up with results relating to autism because it’s not actually searching for ‘what is the aspectrum’.

It’s correcting to ‘what is the spectrum’.

Unsurprisingly none of the results of that search have the word ‘aspectrum’ in them. Because it isn’t even searching for that word.

So what happens when you correct it to search specifically for ‘what is the aspectrum’?

You get a whole lot of stuff that has nothing to do with either autism or ace/aro identities.

ignoring the op’s search results, op also said aspec. looking up aspec gives you something like this:

op why are u lying lol

@urstraight explain yourself

Because thats all they’re proficient at. Lying. Revisionist history.

asexual conversion therapy, or as i like to call it, encouragement towards recovery from sexual trauma or otherwise attempts to give people a healthy relationship with sex (regardless of if they want to or will engage in it or not)

bullshittaery:

weedcourse:

maps-are-nasty:

fumbledeegrumble:

displacecourse:

zorak-hates-regs:

weedcourse:

socialjusticeichigo:

socialjusticeichigo:

fumbledeegrumble:

generallydiscourse:

flower-course:

nonbicanary:

interesting

You’re disgusting

Apparently it’s okay to suggest calling something conversion therapy as long as you think you’re making a quirky joke about it.

As someone who’s experienced cult/religion based attempts at “conversion”: Be fucking ashamed of yourself.

hi exclusionists what the fuck is wrong with you jw thanks

So now they’re flat out advocating for conversion therapy of asexuals. Nice. That’s real fucking nice.

The assumptions here seem to be:

A: All asexuals are asexual as a result of sexual trauma.

B. Asexuals don’t have a healthy relationship with sex ever.

C. If a therapist tries to convince an asexual trauma survivor to change their orientation, it’s not really conversion therapy even if said asexual has expressed they’re okay and comfortable in their orientation.

D. A therapist trying to convince an asexual who isn’t a trauma survivor to change their orientation never happens.

They are also assuming that recovery from sexual trauma necessarily means regaining lost sexual attraction.

God my blood is boiling. Its surreal how exclusionists claim to be the ~pure protectors of the community~ but constantly let this shit slide. I should just delete all my posts and become an ace positivity blog because ace discourse has the all effects and use of conversing with a brick wall.

it’s surreal how I never even expressed agreement with anon and yet you guys are losing your minds over one (1) anonymous message and spewing garbage about how this is what all exclusionists are truly like

yeah it’s almost as if a failure to condemn a comment like that might spark outrage or something you fucking genius

hmm it might be a stretch, but it seems like.. just maybe…. the fact that you didn’t reject that comment.. and actually responded to it positively… implies you agree with it.. hmmm

Also like… We are literally criticising the anon. Why you getting so defensive if you don’t agree hmm?

Not to mention you have agreed in replies to other anons so…

besides the ‘interesting’ carrying all the implications op intended I actually really hate this post because I went through this exact shit in regards to being ace AND in regards to gender/orientation so like. honestly ingest shit @ anyone who thinks this is a joke, esp if you never had to deal with garbage medicine trying to ‘fix’ you.

yeah, as someone who has dealt with so much psychiatric abuse regarding my nonstraight orientations and being trans, I think y’all should be fucking ashamed of yourselves.

which includes the fact that op somehow thinks it’s fine to not call out conversion therapy shit like this and comments with what is obviously intended to agree with this, who are you trying to fool when you respond in a way many people do when agreeing with anons? this isn’t a ‘oh those aceys getting upset’ it’s an actual genuine homophobic comment not being condemned and being agreed with by you

liliac-gold:

Ah i see.We have officially reached that point of discourse where people are making the “i identify as an attack helicopter gender jokes” regarding other people’s genders except instead of anti SJs doing it,it is people in the LGBT community themselves doing it about people finding genders and labels to suit them just because they dont consider their genders “valid” enough.

I think its high time that gatekeepers took a step back from their incessant bullying and attacking other people for no fucking reason and reflect on weather their “efforts” to keep “cishets” out of the LGBT+ community are actually productive in making the community a so called safe space; or weather its just a farce for awkward people on the internet to make their pathetic selves feel better and above others by putting down and mocking sexual and gender identities which they consider beneath their activism’s scope.

The more ridiculous and pathetic their arguments and “humor” against non LG identities get, the more it seems clear that the only people they want to make the LGBT community safe for is cis white people considering the fact that yall have resorted to making fun of other people’s genders in the name of “activism” and are fucking racist as hell. 

For the record.This was in reply to this post of mine.

fuckyeahasexual:

“You don’t get ace people killing themselves because of aphobia”, Tea on canvas (2018)

If you ever see this please reply with @@@thetrevorproject . They are for aces to use, they have trained specfically because aces were calling. 

This is also a painful example why excluding people causes harm. Hotlines want people to call it’s often dtiretly tied into their funding so remind people resources are around to be used by anyone in need. 

aphobehaterofficial:

christopherokamoto:

ehimezol:

ajanigoldmane:

lesbianrey:

lesbianrey:

the coffee shop next door to my new apartment

what more can you ask for

Isnt this one of them LGBT cafes yall constantly hating on?

funny that an exclusionist would be praising this. i thought LGBT cafes were horrible and disrespectful to gay bars and our history and only Aceys wany LGBT cafes so they can Sneak In

this is fucking outrageous lmao

This REG has directly mocked the idea of queer cafes, too…

[original, archive]

[original, archive]

so when aces and disabled people are interested in lgbt+ spaces outside of bars and clubs were evil and hate the real lgbts, but when theres one next door “what more can you ask for”

nonbinarypastels:

*casually kneads dough as i read over my recipe for honey oat bread* the lgbptn acronym was specifically created by gatekeepers in order to exclude queer, intersex, and a-spec people from the community. you may not have been around when it was coined, don’t keep up with diskourse, and/or are genuinely confused when you ask “why is everyone i see using this term an aphobe/bigot?!”, but the answer is that it is a term that was created by bigots specifically for their bigotry. the fact that a large amount of aphobes use this acronym is not a bug but a feature and you should be wary of anyone you see using it.

daniethowell:

saying you’re asexual isn’t cringy

saying you’re aromantic isn’t cringy

saying you’re demi/gray isn’t cringy

saying you’re sex repulsed isn’t cringy

saying you’re sex positive/natural isn’t cringy

A-spec identities aren’t cringy

but having a blog dedicated to bullying people for their sexual/romantic orientation?

now That’s cringy