i hate the idea of da4 taking place in a mage ruled country or w/e because i just Know there’s going to be a lot of unavoidable galaxy brained writing and commentary abt how evil magic is + a very bad attempt at proving mages and magic alone is responsible for how fucked tevinter is without any critical thinking on the writers part. bonus if “they don’t allow chantry run circles or templars and this is why everything is chaos” becomes a main plot point you lose companion approval protesting. cullen is there
you are allowed to encourage or start an elf uprising against slavery, but the narrative guilts you all the way through for encouraging violence and causing a mess. two wrongs don’t make a right, you’ve become just as evil as your oppressors, you need to have pity and understanding for them, too 😦
one of your companions is an unrelenting slavery apologist and you’re never allowed to call them out for it, you’re instead encouraged via dialogue options to listen to their side of things and realize not everything is black or white, and you could be “ruining lives” by ending the practice entirely. this is made to be a morally questionable choice
Female Qunaris having smaller horns is still one of the most offensive things Bioware has ever done
I think what confuses me the most, is that if it actually does turn out to be that the reason qunari look the way they look is because of dragon influence… then why is it that while only female dragons grow to be giant sized high dragons, male qunari characters all have giant models while female qunari characters have basically the exact same model as a female human but taller? And of course, that includes their horns.
^Rasaan from Those Who Speak #1, first ever depiction of a female qunari, standing next to a male counterpart
qunari in DA2 were a scary foreign force of militant eastern enemies, and they looked very inhuman.
come da:i, qunari were a playable race and therefore had to be less evil-looking, so the difference in humanization between men and women shrunk;
that above comic iteration obviously depicted qunari back during their ‘scary monster people from the south/east’ days, and bioware suddenly found themselves needing to draw a qunari woman. and that’s the direction they took. she has none of the men’s gauntness in her facial structure, and her skintone is more beige.
tldr; bioware’s track of qunari humanization can be measured in both the sexualization of women, and also the dehumanization of people of color.
Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, Wynne, and lets discuss this without the limitations of three dialogue options to choose from.
“The mages will never be free! The Chantry will never allow it. Our only hope for survival is to show them we can be trusted!”
There has NEVER been a case in history where oppressors were shown the error of their ways by the oppressed ‘showing them they can be trusted.’ Because there is nothing that is ever good enough in their eyes. And you’d think the fact that the Chantry will never allow freedom would be a red flag??? That you need to fear your survival at all???
“Don’t you remember what happened to Circle in Ferelden? Do you want to give the templars another excuse to call for the culling of all mages?”
Why YES, I remember the Circle. I remember a warden mage, an apostate, a warden warrior and their fucking dog having to step in to do the job the templars are supposedly meant and trained for, but opted instead to just killeveryone. Fucking pinnacle of an example there, Wynne.
And really? “Give the templars an excuse?” THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR MASS MURDER OF INNOCENTS.
“This change cannot be forced.”
To quote Briala in The Masked Empire, “Freedom is not given. It is won.” Trying to be as perfect an underling as possible will never amount to anything, because it will never be good enough. There is nothing you can do to convince oppressors to just grant equality to people they see as beneath them. That’s kind of the whole damn problem. You cannot expect change to come without confronting the problem.
The Libertarians are the second largest group of mages. That is a really big portion. Enough so that in 9:31 they have enough power to petition separating from the Chantry the first time, as detailed by Wynne right here. They try again in 9:37. Then finally in 9:39, the rebellion began. So, let’s not pretend that there was no large force against the Circles before Anders blew up the Chantry. Fiona was working her ass off for years, before Anders even took his Harrowing.
I think it’s also important to note, though, that what’s underlying Wynne’s sentiments here is fear.
She doesn’t say ‘I think the brightest future we can have is by working peaceably with the chantry’. She says ‘our only hope for survival is to show them we can be trusted’. And this comes from a lifetime of internalizing that people are justified in fearing mages (because of course, that’s what Circle mages – and even those outside the Circle – are always told), and believing that it’s this fear that needs to be defeated. If only they weren’t afraid of us, many mages think, then everything would get better. If only Bad Mages would stop giving people reasons to hate us, then we could show them that we’re not all like that; we could earn our freedom and livelihoods by defeating fear.
Except, the fear of mages (not magic – mages) in Southern Thedas is something the chantry encourages. It’s basically hard-coded into their take on Andrastrianism, and is one of the cornerstones of their politics. Fear of mages is what helps rally people against Tevinter, and it’s what ensures parents turn their mage children over to the Circle, and supply the chantry with free labourers and the nobility with exclusive access to the best healers and long-range combatants in the world. It’s what provides the chantry with any templar recruits who aren’t conscripted from the orphanages. There is no recourse for assuaging that ‘fear’, because the people who keep perpetuating it are engaged in a calculated form of propaganda, and have no interest in ending it. They benefit from it. They actively encourage it, so it’s not a genuine misunderstanding by any stretch of the imagination.
Wynne’s approach is exactly what the chantry wants. Mages working quietly to try and gain more autonomy, which they will never be granted because the condition of that autonomy is ‘well you can have it when you prove you can be trusted with it’. And then, invariably, some mage does something bad (because even if mages never had a reason to be desperate or take drastic actions, you’re always going to have asshole mages – there are assholes in every group in the world), and this becomes the excuse to tighten the leash and put off all those pesky issues of freedom and individual rights. This whole conversation demonstrates the problem, really – Wynne brings up Kinloch Hold as an example of why the Chantry might currently hesitate to let mages govern themselves. What she doesn’t seem to realize is that there is always going to be something. Some Circle with troubles, some rebellious mages with issues, some maleficarum stirring up nonsense, or hell, even just Tevinter continuing to exist, will provide the Chantry with the means to go ‘mmm, I dunno, you guys don’t seem like perfect saints to me yet – best we keep on imprisoning you, executing you, and cutting out parts of your essential beings to turn you into obedient labourers whenever we feel like it. But, oh, of course, just as soon as you achieve a level of monolithic virtue that literally no group of people has ever achieved before, you’ll be free to go. I’m sure it’ll happen for you any day now.’
It’s hard to blame Wynne for wanting to believe it could work out, though. Just like it’s hard to blame Vivienne for hating the war. Violent conflict is… well, violent. And it’s very hard to instigate a revolution when you know that, by the same stroke, you’re definitely consigning vulnerable and innocent people to die in the fallout. The Tranquil, the little apprentices, the elderly, ill, or disabled mages, the ones who aren’t good at fighting or casting big spells or surviving exposure to the elements – these are the people who will be cut down, who will suffer once the situation turns to full-blown rebellion.
I think it’s really telling that Wynne and Vivienne are both people who express a lot of distress at the suffering of, like, mage children, or Tranquil. Viv gets very upset over the Tranquil skulls issue in DA:I, and when we meet Wynne, she’s doing her level best to protect the apprentices from the abominations roaming the halls. Circles are communities. The same mages who have to decide whether or not to go to war are the ones who teach the young apprentices, who grew up with Senior Enchanter Marvin who’s faulty hip means he’d never be able to run in a crisis, who knew Tranquil Gwen back when she was an eight-year-old girl who cried from homesickness and missed her mother’s hugs.
The templars have much less dilemma. For example, someone like Cullen would never have to worry that going to war with the mages would mean bringing along his sister’s children, and watching them struggle or go hungry or be cut down by enemy swords. It makes it hard for me to be at all angry with Wynne, or any other mage like her – they want to find a peaceful resolution.
It’s just, they can’t, because the chantry is not a peaceful organization. And that’s heartbreaking. It’s sincerely awful that there’s really no recourse for the people who genuinely don’t want to hurt anyone, to obtain the basic rights they need to avoid being killed or violated on a regular basis.
whitemanning critical 